Which reasoning type focuses on accumulating specific instances to formulate a general conclusion?

Inductive reasoning is characterized by the process of gathering specific instances or observations and using them to derive a broader generalization or conclusion. This approach often involves looking for patterns or regularities within the data collected. For instance, if one observes that the sun has risen in the east every day, one might conclude that the sun always rises in the east. This type of reasoning is particularly valuable in scientific inquiry where researchers develop theories based on accumulated evidence from experiments and observations.

On the other hand, deductive reasoning starts with a general statement or hypothesis and examines the possibilities to reach a specific, logical conclusion. Logical reasoning encompasses both inductive and deductive methodologies, focusing on the forms and structures of arguments rather than the accumulation of instances. Circular reasoning entails repeating a conclusion in different wording within the premise, which does not lead to a new understanding or generalization. Therefore, the focus on specific instances leading to a broader conclusion distinctly aligns with inductive reasoning.